Approval
A configured action exceeds Claire’s authority and requires an accountable owner to approve or reject it.
Claire handles repeatable coordination without pretending every decision should be automated. Approvals, judgment, empathy, expertise, accountability, and exceptions remain with the people responsible for them.
Weak automation sends a transcript or creates a generic ticket. A useful handoff explains what happened, what has already been checked, why the workflow stopped, what decision is needed, and what happens after the person responds.
A configured action exceeds Claire’s authority and requires an accountable owner to approve or reject it.
The request falls outside a normal policy path, contains conflicting information, or needs a discretionary accommodation.
The situation requires professional expertise, negotiation, reassurance, clinical or legal judgment, or relationship management.
The human should enter at the decision point—not restart the workflow from the beginning.
Claire can collect scheduling and coverage context. Access staff handle clinical concerns, policy exceptions, sensitive complaints, and cases requiring judgment.
Claire can gather matter information and support conflicts workflows. Attorneys and authorized staff decide representation, legal advice, and professional obligations.
Claire can collect documents and apply configured servicing checks. Authorized personnel handle exceptions, regulated decisions, and required approvals.
Bring us a workflow and we will map its authority boundaries, exception paths, and human ownership.